Recently, I've had trouble picking out a good book. Since it's summer, I've found myself wandering around numerous bookstores, looking for good books to add to my reading list. For the life of me, however, I don't know what to pick. Looking back, I've never had this issue before. Lately, though, I feel like every book I pick up has recommendations like "Absolutely brilliant," "Fast-paced throughout" or some such generic claim. This is aside from it being on such-and-such bestseller lists and the averagely-impressive number of copies it has sold. It places the innocent reader in the middle of a warzone. How am I to know, for instance, that this apparent international bestseller (among hundreds) won't leave me groaning at cliche phraseology or diction. Don't get me wrong, I am all for light-hearted, summer reads (I find it quite therapeutic actually). I just don't want to purchase a book that has a potentially intriguing idea and find that its shallowness is something to be marvelled at. Gone are the days, apparently, when I'd know a good book just by picking it up.
I hope I don't sound like an absolute priss saying this, but I avoid going into a bookstore with a physical reading list; it ruins the magic of the experience. Having a pristine, technical list of books to look for takes away those moments of breathlessly opening up a random novel and being inexplicably hooked, devouring the first few chapters while walking up to the cash register. For me, wandering around the bookstore with a list makes shopping a terribly clinical procedure, like buying one's weekly round of milk-- very little thought is required. I have always believed that the real way to buy a book is to have that irresistable gut feeling convincing you that the book absolutely needs to be on your shelf. Given this, perhaps ridiculous, penchant in the way I buy books, I have noted with increasing alarm the aforementioned difficulty ofpicking out a particularly good book; intuition often fails me in the face of a particularly summery cover, and the words that hook me are also likely to be found in a dozen other brightly-coloured books littering the area. Nowadays, I always buy them with a frantic prayer that the purchase is well-deserved and that I'm not spending extravagantly on "throw immediately once read and never ever recommend" novels. Oh the risky life I lead.


Haha, such a risky life. It
jhcanel — June 12, 2011 - 22:03Haha, such a risky life. It seems to me, however, that your post underscores the value of journals in the contemporary literary community. Journal editors essentially function as filters. We read thousands of submissions and pass along to the readership those pieces we believe to be of greatest interest. If you are so fortunate as to discover a journal whose editorial team is both rigorous and compatible (at least generally) with your taste, you'll always have a reliable read on hand.
a real "tour de force"
aronan — June 20, 2011 - 12:57Sakina, I agree with you regarding troubling recommendations on book covers. While Jon makes a good point about the role of journals in providing reviews, it seems that everything I pick up promises to be a "tour de force" according to someone. There's a lack of precision in the pull quotes that grace most book covers as well as general overuse of common terms in reviews. The marketing strategies of publishers seem to encourage a gross misuse of ellipses, which allow for phrases like "the best....American....novel...in the past twenty years" to be included. I swear I've seen that exact example, I just can't remember what book it was. Hopefully you've found a good book by now, but even still, I thought you might enjoy this list of "The top 20 most annoying book reviewer cliches." It's a good reminder to be precise and clear in discussing or reviewing books.
http://www.examiner.com/book-in-national/the-top-20-most-annoying-book-r...
RE:
Sakina Esufally — June 26, 2011 - 18:44Thanks for the article. The sentence "Reviewerspeak isn't just annoying: it's a black hole that sucks in meaning faster than I can down a gin martini (no vermouth, three olives)" is absolutely stunning in describing the compelling, powerful and poignant language of reviewers, all possible puns intended.
Also Jon, it's not so much a question of underestimating the value of a good journal, but rather that when choosing one story to read about, a journal really doesn't come into play. In the search for valuable and varied literary pieces, journals are indeed invaluable. For a singular narrative, however, novels dominate the field for me. And that's where the trouble starts!
Reviews
chswimmer — July 4, 2011 - 13:41What we need is some sort of Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic for book reviews. I do believe that if you agglomerate anough reviews by respected critics, you can seperate the good from the bad. Perhaps this already exists, I'm just not aware of it.