While Literary Laundry is a publication that reveres the written word and, I believe, values the age-old tradition of verse in all its forms, LL is also a hub of dynamic and continuous conversation about the state of literature today (as evidenced by the below blogs). When it comes to the tradition of poetry, we generally agree that it began in an oral form as with Homer's famous ancient greek epics, spoken before written, sounds sung to express emotion, to tell a story, to be remembered. Even the word "language" comes from the word for tongue. While people often say poetry comes from the heart, the soul, the mind, etc, it is also undeniably physical: the rhythms, rhymes, alliterations, meter or line breaks, the cadences in general. Maybe poetry is indeed born in the mouth. This brings me to my question...what has happened to the oral tradition today? Maybe our lack of attention to this aspect of poetry is the reason poetry seems to live behind the great shadows of popular music, film, even plays and novels. What happened to the times when musicians named themselves after poets, like Bob Dylan with Dylan Thomas?
Of course, today, maybe more than ever audio readings of poems are available because of technological advancements. Often when searching for poems, I come across the chance to click a link and hear a poem in the poet's voice...reading series abound at universities and community centers, and yet...for a medium that values voice the most, there's seems to be some sort of dilution in the way be people read. On the one hand spoken word poetry has taken off, and can be quite exhilarating, but it can also fall into its own monotony, not only with familiar rhythms but also with content. Lyric poets on the other hand seem to retreat into either deadpan breathiness or unnatural lilts that try to hard to jerk the audience awake as if pausing at strange points will somehow clarify the sense of an obscure stanza.

